NEED-TO-KNOW NEWS — For Friday Feb. 21
[Scroll down (below today’s entries) for full week’s compendia
— after clicking “Read more »” at end of today’s lede story]
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY — IN BRIEF
A Voice of Baltimore compendium, local and beyond. Your weekday morning look (with links) at late-breaking news, current events, and what will be talked about wherever you may go on Friday:

FCC plan to put investigators in nation’s newsrooms conjures up images of George Orwell and his 1984-style ‘Big Brother.’
Is a plan by the Federal Communications Commission to place investigators in newsrooms throughout the country simply an innocent attempt to assess how editorial decisions are made and whether media outlets are biased?
Or is it an extreme violation of Freedom of the Press and the First Amendment?
The FCC “does not and will not interfere in newsrooms or editorial decision making” nor does it intend “to regulate the speech of news media” in America, the agency emphatically declared in a statement released Thursday via email exclusively to Voice of Baltimore’s media partner WBFF Fox45-TV.
“Any suggestion the Commission intends to regulate the speech of news media is false,” the statement continues, adding that the draft questions in its study for the plan “are being revised to clear up any confusion.”
The FCC proposal is the latest Big Brother “intrusive surveillance of the press” by the Obama Administration, Investor’s Business Daily charged in an editorial late last week following an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal whereby one of the agency’s Republican minority commissioners, Ajit Pai, warned that a plan to dispatch researchers into radio, television and even newspaper newsrooms — known as the “Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs” — is proceeding apace, despite the grave danger it presents to the First Amendment to the Constitution and the right of free speech and Freedom of the Press.
“The government has no place pressuring media organizations into covering certain stories,” Pai maintains.
The FCC insists however that broadcasters’ participation in the study would be strictly “voluntary.” But Pai questions that assertion, since the agency has control over TV and radio licenses, the denial of which would put such broadcasters out of business — constituting a conflict of interest on the part of the FCC, he says.