PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES NEVER
ALLOW FACTS TO STAND IN THE WAY
OF INFLAMING CAMPAIGN RHETORIC
Debate over Scalia seat on Court
is politics-as-usual at its worst
HILLARY’S ‘FANCY FOOTWORK’
MAKES DANCER FRED ASTAIRE
SEEM STATIONARY AND RIGID
An up-and-coming blowhard
By David Maril
Is hypocrisy a prerequisite for politicians? Do political candidates need to follow any standards of accuracy in comments they make when seeking votes for elected positions?
Bernie Sanders is viewed as a breath of fresh air because of his outspoken, theatrical demeanor.
Even though he has spent decades of his life getting very little done in Congress, he portrays himself as a Washington outsider.
But to the surprise of many political observers, this 74-year-old Socialist is mounting a serious threat to preventing an easy anointment of Hillary Clinton as the presidential nominee of the Democrats.
However, even this “tell-it-like-it-is” candidate resorted to old political hack tricks by accusing Clinton of attempting to portray herself as being closer than she actually is to President Barack Obama simply to curry favor with minority voters.
If he really believes this, how does he justify pandering to the Rev. Al Sharpton, paying a visit to this media publicity hound for an endorsement to increase his support from minority voters?
Hillary Clinton? — She, as an old friend of mine used to say, makes dancer Fred Astaire look as stationary as the Washington Monument when it comes to her fancy footwork, shifting positions with double-talk.
A veteran of political campaigns, she broke, even for her, new ground by originally labeling herself a “moderate” one day… and then, seeing that wasn’t fashionable anymore, insisting she is a “progressive.”
Over on the Republican side, the candidates, except for Ohio Gov. John Kasich, are so irresponsible in their remarks, an army of fact-checkers could be gainfully employed to track all the fiction they are circulating.