
Failure of America’s politicians to deal with and solve the ongoing Social Security funding issue is an example of the lack of states- manship and leadership by the country’s national representatives.
SELF-SERVING HOT-AIR PROMISES
WITH FEW SPECIFICS ON HOW
TO MAKE THINGS BETTER
Social Security funding issue is an example
of America’s failure to correct a program
that is easily fixable and should be done
STATESMANSHIP AND LEADERSHIP
IN SHORT SUPPLY IN U.S. POLITICS
By David Maril
With local and national elections on the horizon, it’s time to gear up for a year of politicians pandering to voters with self-serving hot-air promises and few specifics on how to make things better.
With all the courage of barking dogs hiding behind trees, politicians on one side will attempt to demonize the other side. Frank, responsible discussions of the long-term issues figure to be in short supply.
One of many topics you won’t hear anyone address is funding of Social Security. That won’t happen until a decade down the road when the program is ready to go broke.
Instead of tweaking it now and making things easier for future generations, it’s easier to concentrate on pleasing wealthy lobbyists who have access to lavish campaign funding.
In the meantime, Social Security is referred to as part of our growing problem related to funding “entitlements.”
Many conservative politicians and commentators pronounce “entitlements” with disdain in their voices while wearing a sneer on their faces.
Right-wingers accuse their lefty counterparts of spending the country into debt, cultivating a nation of softies dependent on their entitlements.
The left accuses the right of being callous and intent on stripping entitlements away from the most vulnerable segments of the population who need them the most.